H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Conchita Martínez vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 1-0
Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Sylvia Hanika in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1989 US Open third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 7-5 6-1 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Conchita Martínez | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |