H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2005 Bangkok round of 32 6-3 6-2.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #40 6-3 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #156 Match data Oct 13, 2005* R32 Bangkok Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Conchita Martínez Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
32 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 2011 3 9 12 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
38 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4% 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 18/135 of Conchita Martínez's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Conchita Martínez Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 —/— 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 —/— 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 —/— 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 —/— 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 —/— 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 2003 10/50 1.5 3.6 58.2% 62.7% 46.9% 50.8% 52.5% 55.9% 49.1% 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 2004 4/37 3.0 3.8 57.1% 64.2% 49.7% 52.7% 37.0% 58.0% 42.7% 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 2005 4/48 2.3 3.3 60.9% 58.0% 45.4% 59.9% 60.8% 52.9% 44.2% 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 —/— 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 —/— 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 —/— 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career 18/955 2.0 3.6 58.6% 62.0% 47.2% 53.2% 50.9% 55.7% 46.6% 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Conchita Martínez Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1730 145.2 -22 -81 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57 1993 1483 96.2 0.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.17
17 1989 1928 154.3 -62 -75 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51 1994 1493 103.5 50.0% -0.83 1–1 +0.06
18 1990 2062 158.8 -43 -68 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28 1995 1479 101.3 +23 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 1991 2076 163.5 -95 +132 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74 1996 1610 124.2 +2 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.66
20 1992 2058 170.3 -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06 1997 1648 125.4 -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 1993 2160 168.9 -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51 1998 1702 138.7 +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 1994 2065 167.5 -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84 1999 1634 113.0 -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 1995 2182 174.1 -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30 2000 1792 139.5 -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 1996 2067 172.1 -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86 2001 1698 135.6 +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 1997 2010 168.8 +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78 2002 1677 130.8 +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 1998 1968 163.0 -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 1999 1898 159.2 -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2000 1923 160.0 -33 +232 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.91
29 2001 1844 131.6 -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 2002 1756 136.7 +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 28.6% -1.57 -0.69
35 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 -0.01
38 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.05
50 2022 1772
52 2024 1745
Career 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.