H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 3-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2002 San Diego third round 5-7 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2002* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #70 5-7 6-2 7-6(4) Tatiana Panova #22 Match data
Nov 5, 1999* Leipzig WTA 250 R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #15 5-7 6-3 6-1 Tatiana Panova #48 Match data
Sep 24, 1999* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #16 6-1 6-1 Tatiana Panova #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 — — — — — — —
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 — — — — — — —
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —