H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-0

Conchita Martínez holds a 2–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1998 Roland Garros third round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #6 6-1 6-0 Virginia Ruano Pascual #48 Match data
Jun 8, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Conchita Martínez #4 6-0 6-4 Virginia Ruano Pascual #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3