H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Zina Garrison H2H: 6-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–1 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 1995 US Open fourth round 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 5, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #3 7-6 7-5 Zina Garrison #33 Match data
Oct 16, 1993* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Zina Garrison #18 7-6 6-4 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data
Aug 1, 1993* Stratton Mountain WTA 250 F Hard Conchita Martínez #6 6-3 6-2 Zina Garrison #20 Match data
Nov 13, 1992* Philadelphia WTA 250 R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #8 4-6 6-3 6-4 Zina Garrison #16 Match data
Apr 11, 1992* Amelia Island WTA 250 QF Clay Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 6-1 Zina Garrison #16 Match data
Sep 3, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #8 6-4 6-4 Zina Garrison #12 Match data
Nov 12, 1990 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #11 6-3 6-0 Zina Garrison #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33 — — — — — — —