H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Connie Capozzi vs Maricaye Christenson H2H: 1-0

Connie Capozzi holds a 1–0 lead over Maricaye Christenson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Connie Capozzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Connie Capozzi won the 1970 Rochester round of 16 6-3 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Connie Capozzi 6-3 6-3 Maricaye Christenson Match data Aug 7, 1970* R16 Rochester WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Connie Capozzi 1,551 10 12 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maricaye Christenson 1,503 23 56 29.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Connie Capozzi Maricaye Christenson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 1–3 25.0% 1,486 0 0
18 1969 2–4 33.3% 1,486 0 0
19 1970 7–5 58.3% 1,534 0 0
20 1968 5–11 31.2% 1,468 0 0
21 1969 3–15 16.7% 1,404 0 0
22 1970 3–7 30.0% 1,389 0 0
23 1971 2–3 40.0% 1,407 0 0
24 1972 4–4 50.0% 1,437 0 0
25 1973 1–5 16.7% 1,400 0 0
26 1974 4–6 40.0% 1,425 0 0
27 1975 1–3 25.0% 1,407 0 0
28 1976 0–2 0.0% 1,390 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Connie Capozzi Maricaye Christenson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1486 99.2 33.3% -1.33 0–1 -0.38
18 1969 1486 96.8 -4 35.7% -1.57 1–1 +0.02
19 1970 1535 105.4 +68 -65 52.2% -0.39 1–0 +0.68
20 1968 1469 97.2 +76 +18 -30 33.3% -1.23 2–0 +0.15
21 1969 1405 96.1 +79 +60 -24 22.5% -1.70 1–3 (25%) +0.34
22 1970 1389 101.7 +79 +62 22.2% -1.61 +0.52
23 1971 1408 102.6 +11 40.0% -0.70 +0.22
24 1972 1437 103.5 +65 55.6% +0.22 0–2 2–1 (67%) +1.65
25 1973 1401 95.0 16.7% -2.67 0–1 +1.04
26 1974 1426 97.5 +70 +15 47.8% -0.83 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 99.1 +1.14
27 1975 1408 101.0 0.0% -2.33 0–1 -0.01
28 1976 1391 94.8 0.0% -4.00 +0.23
Career 1552 101.3 +68 -38 43.5% -0.93 2–2 (50%) +1.52 1503 97.7 +73 +50 -13 31.1% -1.35 3–8 (27%) 5–3 (63%) 97.0 +6.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.