H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Corinne Vanier vs Annabel Croft H2H: 0-1

Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Corinne Vanier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1984 Durban quarterfinal 7-6 7-5.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 7-6 7-5 Corinne Vanier Match data Apr 28, 1984* QF Durban WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Corinne Vanier 1,642 43 91 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annabel Croft 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Corinne Vanier Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1981 9–5 64.3% 1,535 0 0
15 1979 2–2 50.0% 1,510 0 0 1982 14–9 60.9% 1,588 0 0
16 1980 0–3 0.0% 1,472 0 0 1983 6–7 46.2% 1,595 0 0
17 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,528 0 0 1984 11–14 44.0% 1,615 0 0
18 1982 10–17 37.0% 1,609 0 0 1985 23–20 53.5% 1,761 0 1
19 1983 12–21 36.4% 1,603 0 0 1986 10–19 34.5% 1,653 0 1
20 1984 11–20 35.5% 1,574 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% 1,574 0 1
21 1985 2–13 13.3% 1,492 0 0 1988 3–3 50.0% 1,562 0 1
22 1986 0–2 0.0% 1,483 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Corinne Vanier Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
16 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1981 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
18 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1984 5 8 13 38.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 17 24 41 41.5% 10 29 39 25.6% 12 24 36 33.3% 2 11 13 15.4% 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Corinne Vanier Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.31
14 1981 1535 118.4 +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 +0.81
15 1979 1510 106.6 60.0% -0.10 0–2 2–0 +0.04 1982 1589 120.1 +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 +2.10
16 1980 1472 92.2 14.3% -3.29 0–1 +0.41 1983 1595 118.1 -29 +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.87
17 1981 1529 114.3 +80 +5 +17 34.9% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +0.15 1984 1615 118.2 -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 1982 1609 108.6 -8 -135 -21 36.1% -1.18 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 105.9 -0.22 1985 1762 133.2 +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 1983 1603 108.9 -52 -54 -5 37.3% -0.85 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 100.6 +0.25 1986 1653 120.6 +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1984 1574 104.6 -66 -44 +33 40.0% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 5–4 (56%) 96.9 +1.62 1987 1575 108.2 +47 -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1985 1492 105.0 +15 -47 +31 18.8% -2.25 0–2 1–4 (20%) -0.42 1988 1562 97.6 +29 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) +0.72
22 1986 1483 103.9 20.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.16
Career 1643 109.5 -16 -61 +9 35.3% -1.20 14–21 (40%) 16–17 (48%) 97.2 +1.25 1780 125.1 +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.