H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Corinne Vanier vs Kim Jones H2H: 0-2

Kim Jones holds a 2–0 lead over Corinne Vanier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1983 Canadian Open round of 64 0-6 6-1 6-2.

H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 0-6 6-1 6-2 Corinne Vanier Match data Aug 17, 1983* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Kim Jones 6-1 4-6 6-3 Corinne Vanier Match data Oct 22, 1981* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Corinne Vanier 1,642 43 91 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Corinne Vanier Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1979 2–2 50.0% 1,510 0 0
16 1980 0–3 0.0% 1,472 0 0
17 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,528 0 0
18 1982 10–17 37.0% 1,609 0 0
19 1983 12–21 36.4% 1,603 0 0
20 1984 11–20 35.5% 1,574 0 0 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
21 1985 2–13 13.3% 1,492 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
22 1986 0–2 0.0% 1,483 0 0 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0
23 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0
24 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0
25 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1
26 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1
27 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1
28 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1
29 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Corinne Vanier Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1981 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1984 5 8 13 38.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
21 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 17 24 41 41.5% 10 29 39 25.6% 12 24 36 33.3% 2 11 13 15.4% 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Corinne Vanier Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1979 1510 106.6 60.0% -0.10 0–2 2–0 +0.04
16 1980 1472 92.2 14.3% -3.29 0–1 +0.41
17 1981 1529 114.3 +80 +5 +17 34.9% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +0.15
18 1982 1609 108.6 -8 -135 -21 36.1% -1.18 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 105.9 -0.22
19 1983 1603 108.9 -52 -54 -5 37.3% -0.85 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 100.6 +0.25
20 1984 1574 104.6 -66 -44 +33 40.0% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 5–4 (56%) 96.9 +1.62 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08
21 1985 1492 105.0 +15 -47 +31 18.8% -2.25 0–2 1–4 (20%) -0.42 1979 1490 +0.09
22 1986 1483 103.9 20.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.16 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50
23 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50
24 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70
29 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24
Career 1643 109.5 -16 -61 +9 35.3% -1.20 14–21 (40%) 16–17 (48%) 97.2 +1.25 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.