H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Corinne Vanier vs Rene Mentz H2H: 1-0

Corinne Vanier holds a 1–0 lead over Rene Mentz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Corinne Vanier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Corinne Vanier won the 1984 Durban round of 16 6-0 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Corinne Vanier
FRA Age 62
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rene Mentz
RSA Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Corinne Vanier 6-0 7-6 Rene Mentz Match data Apr 27, 1984* R16 Durban WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Corinne Vanier — — — 1,642 43 91 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rene Mentz — — — 1,543 6 7 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Corinne Vanier Rene Mentz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1980 0–3 0.0% — 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,528 0 0 1983 2–2 50.0% — 1,521 0 1
18 1982 10–17 37.0% — 1,609 0 0 1984 4–5 44.4% — 1,527 0 1
19 1983 12–21 36.4% — 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1984 11–20 35.5% — 1,574 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1985 2–13 13.3% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Corinne Vanier Rene Mentz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 5 8 13 38.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 24 41 41.5% 10 29 39 25.6% 12 24 36 33.3% 2 11 13 15.4% — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Corinne Vanier Rene Mentz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1979 1510 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.10 0–2 2–0 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 1472 92.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -3.29 0–1 — — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1529 114.3 — — — — +80 +5 +17 34.9% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.15 1983 1522 107.6 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 1–1 — -0.03
18 1982 1609 108.6 — — — — -8 -135 -21 36.1% -1.18 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 105.9 -0.22 1984 1528 101.2 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.23 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.2 +1.10
19 1983 1603 108.9 — — — — -52 -54 -5 37.3% -0.85 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 100.6 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 1574 104.6 — — — — -66 -44 +33 40.0% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 5–4 (56%) 96.9 +1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 1492 105.0 — — — — +15 -47 +31 18.8% -2.25 0–2 1–4 (20%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 1483 103.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1643 109.5 — — — — -16 -61 +9 35.3% -1.20 14–21 (40%) 16–17 (48%) 97.2 +1.25 — 1543 104.0 — — — — +69 — — 45.2% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 +8.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.