H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Cornelia Dries vs Kate Brasher H2H: 0-1

Kate Brasher holds a 1–0 lead over Cornelia Dries in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Brasher leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Brasher won the 1980 Neumunster round of 32 6-3 2-6 7-5.

H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Brasher 6-3 2-6 7-5 Cornelia Dries Match data Jul 10, 1980* R32 Neumunster WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cornelia Dries — — — 1,585 20 27 42.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Brasher — — — 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cornelia Dries Kate Brasher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,465 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1979 0–4 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1980 8–11 42.1% — 1,480 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1981 29–16 64.4% — 1,622 0 2
19 1980 5–11 31.2% — 1,459 0 0 1982 25–11 69.4% — 1,638 0 4
20 1981 10–7 58.8% — 1,559 0 0 1983 3–5 37.5% — 1,612 0 6
21 1982 4–5 44.4% — 1,555 0 0 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,584 0 6
22 1983 1–3 25.0% — 1,546 0 0 1985 0–3 0.0% — 1,531 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cornelia Dries Kate Brasher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1980 — — — — 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1981 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 1982 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1983 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — — — — — 11 20 31 35.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — 2 4 6 33.3% 17 18 35 48.6% 5 17 22 22.7% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cornelia Dries Kate Brasher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1481 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.46
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1466 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1493 109.5 — — — — — — +18 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.67
16 1977 1483 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 1979 1440 92.3 — — — — — +18 — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.64
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 106.8 — — — — — -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) — — +0.59
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1622 128.1 — — — — — — -125 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.47
19 1980 1460 109.7 — — — — — -12 — 35.5% -0.77 0–1 0–1 — +0.56 1982 1639 118.1 — — — — -125 -5 -131 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.59
20 1981 1559 112.9 — — — — — -52 — 52.8% -0.06 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.46 1983 1612 104.4 — — — — — — -133 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.31
21 1982 1555 106.2 — — — — — -44 — 43.5% -0.87 3–2 (60%) 4–0 (100%) 105.5 +0.58 1984 1585 95.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.43 1–0 — — +0.62
22 1983 1547 98.9 — — — — — +9 — 22.2% -1.67 1–0 — — +0.02 1985 1531 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.31
Career — 1586 109.6 — — — — — -25 — 41.6% -0.68 7–4 (64%) 5–2 (71%) 107.9 +4.17 — 1735 116.9 — — — — -125 -4 -77 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.