H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cristina Torrens Valero vs Amanda Hopmans H2H: 1-1
Cristina Torrens Valero and Amanda Hopmans are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cristina Torrens Valero leads 1–0 on clay, while Amanda Hopmans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Hopmans won the 2001 Auckland third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 50
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2001* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Hopmans | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Cristina Torrens Valero | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1999* | Budapest | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Cristina Torrens Valero | 6-2 6-0 | Amanda Hopmans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Torrens Valero | #1,073 | #27 | 955 | 1,787 | 117 | 153 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Amanda Hopmans | #978 | #72 | 411 | 1,604 | 23 | 35 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristina Torrens Valero | Amanda Hopmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #183 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #97 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #103 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #162 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #79 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #109 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |