H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cristina Torrens Valero vs Maja Zivec Skulj H2H: 0-1
Maja Zivec Skulj holds a 1–0 lead over Cristina Torrens Valero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maja Zivec Skulj leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maja Zivec Skulj won the 1993 Curitiba third round 5-7 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 52
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1993* | Curitiba | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maja Zivec Skulj | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Cristina Torrens Valero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Torrens Valero | #1,073 | #27 | 955 | 1,787 | 117 | 153 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Maja Zivec Skulj | — | — | — | 1,500 | 11 | 30 | 26.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristina Torrens Valero | Maja Zivec Skulj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #183 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #97 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #79 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #109 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |