H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cristina Torrens Valero vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 1-2
Natasha Zvereva holds a 2–1 lead over Cristina Torrens Valero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on carpet, while Cristina Torrens Valero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 2000 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2000* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-4 | Cristina Torrens Valero | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1999* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Cristina Torrens Valero | 6-3 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1997* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Natasha Zvereva | 6-2 6-3 | Cristina Torrens Valero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Torrens Valero | #1,073 | #27 | 955 | 1,787 | 117 | 153 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristina Torrens Valero | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #183 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1997 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #97 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #79 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2003 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #109 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |