H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Andrea Glass H2H: 1-0

Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Glass in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2001 Roland Garros round of 64 4-6 7-5 6-0.

CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #42 4-6 7-5 6-0 Andrea Glass #79 Match data May 31, 2001* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Andrea Glass #648 #53 475 1,638 35 85 29.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Andrea Glass
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1992 0–1 0.0% #287 1,496 0 0
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 1996 6–14 30.0% #104 1,500 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 1997 3–12 20.0% #89 1,458 0 0
21 1998 7–15 31.8% #76 1,509 0 0
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 1999 8–12 40.0% #84 1,580 0 0
23 2000 3–9 25.0% #131 1,545 0 0
24 2001 7–18 28.0% #105 1,489 0 0
25 2002 1–4 20.0% #242 1,484 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Andrea Glass
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1999 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
21 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% 10 29 39 25.6% 21 37 58 36.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 11 13 15.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Andrea Glass
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1992 1496 98.0 0.0% -3.00 -0.20
16 1999 1522 117.6 50.0% -0.50 -0.06
17 2000 1698 131.5 +23 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15
18 2001 1772 151.8 +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29
19 2002 1718 137.2 -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 1996 1501 118.7 +34 +25 36.2% -0.89 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) -0.20
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 -0.74 1997 1458 107.6 +13 +49 33.3% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 98.2 +0.84
21 1998 1509 120.0 -67 +76 36.2% -1.28 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 103.6 -0.23
22 2005 1600 108.4 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 -0.49 1999 1581 130.0 -101 +78 45.8% -0.50 4–6 (40%) 0–4 (0%) 98.4 -0.26
23 2000 1546 108.7 -90 +66 35.5% -1.29 2–5 (29%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.03
24 2001 1490 112.3 -38 +52 35.6% -1.22 2–7 (22%) 1–1 -0.64
25 2002 1485 101.0 18.2% -1.91 1–0 0–1 -0.18
Career 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 1639 120.9 -36 +58 36.3% -1.09 17–31 (35%) 9–14 (39%) 94.5 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.