H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daja Bedanova vs Cara Black H2H: 3-1
Daja Bedanova holds a 3–1 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2003 Charleston second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2003* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Daja Bedanova | 6-3 7-5 | Cara Black | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daja Bedanova | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-0 | Cara Black | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2001* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Cara Black | 5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1999* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Daja Bedanova | 6-3 7-5 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daja Bedanova | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |