H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Cara Black H2H: 3-1

Daja Bedanova holds a 3–1 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2003 Charleston Open round of 64 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Cara Black
ZIM Age 47 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #47 6-3 7-5 Cara Black #66 Match data Apr 9, 2003* R64 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Daja Bedanova #45 7-5 6-7(5) 6-0 Cara Black #52 Match data Aug 15, 2001* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Cara Black #40 5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Daja Bedanova #36 Match data Feb 1, 2001* R32 Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Daja Bedanova #565 6-3 7-5 Cara Black #51 Match data Nov 11, 1999* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Cara Black #679 #31 869 1,772 115 152 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Cara Black
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 1998 10–10 50.0% #44 1,614 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 1999 17–22 43.6% #50 1,629 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2000 22–21 51.2% #41 1,749 0 0
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 2001 19–25 43.2% #58 1,635 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2002 20–21 48.8% #56 1,620 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2003 18–25 41.9% #51 1,602 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2004 6–21 22.2% #138 1,473 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2005 2–2 50.0% #179 1,504 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2006 1–3 25.0% #288 1,507 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% #660 1,489 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Cara Black
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 9 10 19 47.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 10 17 27 37.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% — 65 84 149 43.6% 23 36 59 39.0% 23 21 44 52.3% 4 11 15 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Cara Black
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) — -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.10 1998 1614 118.9 — — — — -37 -49 +50 45.8% -0.23 6–2 (75%) 1–1 — -0.28
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74 1999 1630 136.6 — — — — -24 -50 +28 43.5% -0.29 4–7 (36%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.66
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1749 143.8 — — — — -39 -180 +62 55.2% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) — -2.05
22 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49 2001 1635 138.8 — — — — +19 -20 +157 46.7% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 8–6 (57%) — -1.26
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1621 125.1 — — — — +47 -45 +121 46.7% -0.19 7–5 (58%) 1–4 (20%) — -1.04
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1602 117.3 +0.23 +1.08 1.019 50.5% -36 +25 +132 41.3% -0.68 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.01
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1473 105.4 -1.30 -2.07 0.845 46.8% +51 +28 +150 26.6% -1.61 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.84
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1505 103.0 +1.03 +0.05 0.933 48.7% — — +144 55.6% +0.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.03
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1508 106.0 +1.65 -0.27 1.032 50.5% -8 — — 33.3% -1.56 0–1 1–0 — -0.19
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1490 104.2 -0.59 -0.88 0.598 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07
Career — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 — 1773 132.7 -0.06 -0.53 0.909 48.1% -2 -37 +94 44.2% -0.38 38–44 (46%) 30–30 (50%) 102.4 -2.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.