H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Daja Bedanova vs Cristina Torrens Valero H2H: 1-1
Daja Bedanova and Cristina Torrens Valero are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on carpet, while Cristina Torrens Valero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cristina Torrens Valero won the 2002 Berlin third round 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2002* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Cristina Torrens Valero | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2001* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Daja Bedanova | 6-0 6-3 | Cristina Torrens Valero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cristina Torrens Valero | #1,073 | #27 | 955 | 1,787 | 117 | 153 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daja Bedanova | Cristina Torrens Valero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #183 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #97 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #79 | 1,534 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #109 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |