H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Daja Bedanova vs Jana Kandarr H2H: 0-1
Jana Kandarr holds a 1–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Kandarr leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Kandarr won the 2001 Indian Wells first round 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2001* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jana Kandarr | 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(6) | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jana Kandarr | #459 | #43 | 687 | 1,641 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daja Bedanova | Jana Kandarr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #313 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #81 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #90 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #85 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #157 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #451 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |