H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Janet Lee H2H: 1-0

Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2001 Los Angeles round of 64 6-4 3-6 6-2.

CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #42 6-4 3-6 6-2 Janet Lee #91 Match data Aug 8, 2001* R64 Los Angeles Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Janet Lee #863 #79 390 1,570 31 67 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Janet Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #547 1,491 0 0
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 1994 1–2 33.3% #270 1,508 0 0
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 1995 4–7 36.4% #169 1,519 0 0
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #175 1,513 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 1997 3–4 42.9% #114 1,525 0 0
21 1998 4–14 22.2% #86 1,498 0 0
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 1999 5–10 33.3% #95 1,487 0 0
23 2000 5–8 38.5% #117 1,514 0 0
24 2001 7–9 43.8% #111 1,555 0 0
25 2002 1–6 14.3% #217 1,524 0 0
26 2003 1–3 25.0% #162 1,511 0 0
28 2005 0–1 0.0% #694 1,495 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Janet Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2000 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2005 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% 26 46 72 36.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Janet Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 50.0% -0.50 -0.06 1993 1492 98.2 0.0% -5.00 +0.01
17 2000 1698 131.5 +23 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15 1994 1508 115.6 +41 28.6% -1.57 1–0 -0.45
18 2001 1772 151.8 +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 1995 1519 101.0 +57 +14 28.6% -2.14 1–0 3–0 (100%) -0.04
19 2002 1718 137.2 -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 1996 1514 120.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.48
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 -0.74 1997 1526 105.6 +53 37.5% -1.13 2–0 0–1 +0.41
21 1998 1499 121.5 +38 30.0% -1.10 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.18
22 2005 1600 108.4 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 -0.49 1999 1488 111.5 +57 -62 38.2% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.61
23 2000 1515 113.7 +33 43.3% -0.40 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) +0.34
24 2001 1556 116.3 +6 47.2% +0.08 3–3 (50%) 0–2 +0.01
25 2002 1525 103.5 +30 13.3% -2.93 1–0 1–1 -0.90
26 2003 1512 102.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +13 33.3% -0.45 0–1 0–1 +0.01
28 2005 1496 98.2 0.0% -2.50 +0.09
Career 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 1571 119.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +36 -24 +13 34.3% -1.01 10–16 (38%) 7–12 (37%) 93.8 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.