H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Daja Bedanova vs Janet Lee H2H: 1-0
Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2001 Los Angeles second round 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2001* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Daja Bedanova | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Janet Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daja Bedanova | Janet Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |