H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 2-0

Daja Bedanova holds a 2–0 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daja Bedanova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2002 Gold Coast round of 16 3-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Joannette Kruger
RSA Age 53 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #28 3-6 7-5 6-2 Joannette Kruger #46 Match data Jan 3, 2002* R16 Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Daja Bedanova #37 6-1 6-2 Joannette Kruger #62 Match data Aug 29, 2001* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Joannette Kruger #972 #21 1,280 1,860 147 163 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Joannette Kruger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 1992 2–3 40.0% #96 1,508 0 0
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 1993 9–13 40.9% #128 1,576 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 1994 13–17 43.3% #79 1,639 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1995 19–15 55.9% #30 1,726 0 1
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 1996 7–13 35.0% #126 1,625 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1997 25–18 58.1% #27 1,785 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1998 25–22 53.2% #30 1,713 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1999 9–13 40.9% #129 1,646 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2000 16–17 48.5% #59 1,657 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2001 21–23 47.7% #46 1,643 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2002 1–4 20.0% #455 1,591 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2003 0–5 0.0% #853 1,531 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Joannette Kruger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 7 7 14 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 16 12 28 57.1% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% — 70 67 137 51.1% 62 64 126 49.2% 7 14 21 33.3% 8 18 26 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Joannette Kruger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 1992 1508 108.6 — — — — — +78 — 41.7% -1.00 1–1 1–1 — 0.00
19 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 1993 1576 111.5 — — — — -64 +57 +8 38.5% -0.98 6–2 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 103.1 -0.32
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74 1994 1640 139.3 — — — — -110 +86 -11 44.1% -0.47 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 -0.48
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1726 133.4 — — — — -64 +26 — 54.5% +0.18 5–4 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 101.5 +0.79
22 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49 1996 1625 111.8 — — — — -5 +66 — 36.6% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 103.7 -0.38
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1786 143.0 — — — — -78 +29 — 53.0% +0.10 11–3 (79%) 6–4 (60%) 109.9 -0.97
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1714 137.8 — — — — +52 +7 — 50.0% -0.24 9–5 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 101.8 +0.70
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1647 113.5 — — — — +68 +11 — 39.6% -0.53 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.5 -0.09
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1658 124.8 — — — — +24 -4 — 50.0% -0.01 6–8 (43%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.73
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1644 115.3 — — — — +38 -79 -127 44.1% -0.64 11–5 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 +0.58
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1591 105.0 — — — — +36 — — 30.8% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.01
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 103.1 -1.38 +1.09 0.673 38.9% — -5 — 16.7% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.40
Career — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 — 1861 132.9 -1.38 +1.09 0.673 38.9% -3 +20 -33 46.1% -0.41 64–42 (60%) 39–40 (49%) 103.4 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.