H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 0-1

Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 1–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 2000 Sydney Olympics second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Halard-Decugis #20 6-3 6-4 Daja Bedanova #86 Match data Sep 23, 2000* R32 Sydney Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
Career — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% — 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06 1987 1643 124.0 — — — — -39 +21 — 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12
17 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15 1988 1612 123.0 — — — — -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31
18 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 1989 1625 118.1 — — — — -29 -13 — 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36
19 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 1990 1708 138.4 — — — — -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74 1991 1821 141.7 — — — — -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1819 144.0 — — — — -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82
22 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49 1993 1819 145.9 — — — — +15 +29 — 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1890 153.5 — — — — -51 +106 — 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1771 131.9 — — — — -28 +220 — 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1856 152.1 — — — — -18 +132 — 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1843 108.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1917 157.6 — — — — -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1930 160.9 — — — — -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1837 145.6 — — — — +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49
Career — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 — 2024 152.3 — — — — -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.