H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-2

Lilia Osterloh holds a 2–1 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lilia Osterloh leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2002 Antwerp round of 32 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #33 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(5) Lilia Osterloh #51 Match data Feb 14, 2002* R32 Antwerp Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Lilia Osterloh #64 6-3 6-3 Daja Bedanova #29 Match data Oct 18, 2001* R32 Bratislava Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lilia Osterloh #47 7-5 7-5 Daja Bedanova #60 Match data Oct 12, 2000* R32 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.