H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Marissa Irvin H2H: 0-1

Marissa Irvin holds a 1–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marissa Irvin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marissa Irvin won the 2002 Miami Open round of 64 7-6(5) 6-2.

CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marissa Irvin #63 7-6(5) 6-2 Daja Bedanova #24 Match data Mar 20, 2002* R64 Miami Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marissa Irvin #854 #51 652 1,603 37 80 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Marissa Irvin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #412 1,495 0 0
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 1999 0–2 0.0% #131 1,487 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 2000 4–7 36.4% #88 1,505 0 0
21 2001 8–14 36.4% #64 1,571 0 0
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 2002 9–18 33.3% #77 1,572 0 0
23 2003 3–11 21.4% #141 1,502 0 0
24 2004 7–13 35.0% #72 1,499 0 0
25 2005 6–14 30.0% #128 1,505 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Marissa Irvin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 8 11 19 42.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2003 1 8 9 11.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% 26 52 78 33.3% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Marissa Irvin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 50.0% -0.50 -0.06
17 2000 1698 131.5 +23 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15
18 2001 1772 151.8 +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 1998 1496 101.1 33.3% -3.00 0–1 -0.04
19 2002 1718 137.2 -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 1999 1487 102.2 0.0% -4.50 -0.30
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 -0.74 2000 1505 117.5 +18 39.3% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 0.00
21 2001 1572 122.9 -1 -33 38.9% -0.74 5–5 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 -1.30
22 2005 1600 108.4 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 -0.49 2002 1572 129.6 +40 -62 37.1% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 -1.41
23 2003 1503 104.4 +12 +35 30.3% -1.57 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 +0.46
24 2004 1500 126.9 -10 +82 38.6% -0.23 1–5 (17%) 3–8 (27%) 93.1 +0.59
25 2005 1506 112.6 -46 +67 36.2% -1.38 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 100.0 -0.56
Career 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 1604 125.7 +5 +17 36.4% -0.97 15–30 (33%) 16–17 (48%) 97.1 -2.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.