H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 1-1

Daja Bedanova and Miriam Oremans are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on grass, while Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2001 Birmingham round of 64 6-3 4-6 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #89 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) Daja Bedanova #39 Match data Jun 13, 2001* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Daja Bedanova #61 6-1 5-7 6-3 Miriam Oremans #73 Match data Oct 29, 2000* F Bratislava Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
Career — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
Career — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.