H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Daja Bedanova vs Paola Suarez H2H: 0-1
Paola Suarez holds a 1–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paola Suarez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2002 Sarasota fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2002* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Paola Suarez | (w/o) | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daja Bedanova | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |