H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Selima Sfar H2H: 1-0

Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2002 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Selima Sfar
TUN Age 49 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #21 6-3 6-2 Selima Sfar #135 Match data Jun 28, 2002* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Selima Sfar #1,005 #75 456 1,590 21 56 27.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Selima Sfar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% #502 1,497 0 0
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #160 1,486 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2001 8–12 40.0% #82 1,521 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2002 5–13 27.8% #139 1,499 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2003 0–3 0.0% #154 1,475 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2004 3–3 50.0% #118 1,521 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2005 2–10 16.7% #193 1,440 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2006 1–5 16.7% #181 1,425 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #166 1,416 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2008 1–3 25.0% #198 1,428 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #281 1,445 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #452 1,436 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Selima Sfar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 7 9 22.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% — 11 33 44 25.0% 6 14 20 30.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Selima Sfar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 1996 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.12
19 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49 2000 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1521 118.1 — — — — +30 +32 +23 41.7% -0.38 4–4 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 98.6 +0.22
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1499 110.5 — — — — +14 +26 +23 33.3% -0.90 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 -0.83
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1475 94.6 +0.29 -2.39 0.326 31.6% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — 0–1 — -0.14
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1522 115.0 — — — — +36 — — 22.2% -2.00 1–0 — — -0.29
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1440 100.3 +0.90 -1.65 0.817 45.0% +44 — — 22.2% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.68
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1426 105.4 -2.14 -0.54 0.765 44.1% +51 — — 21.4% -1.72 1–1 — — -0.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1416 104.3 -0.73 -2.75 0.768 43.5% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1429 111.6 +1.09 +2.41 0.851 46.9% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1446 106.1 -0.26 +0.36 0.848 45.8% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — -0.10
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1436 99.1 -3.09 -0.72 0.761 44.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06
Career — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 — 1591 114.9 -0.72 -0.33 0.763 44.1% +32 +28 +23 29.5% -1.29 7–11 (39%) 5–13 (28%) 96.4 -0.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.