H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Daja Bedanova vs Selima Sfar H2H: 1-0
Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2002 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Daja Bedanova | 6-3 6-2 | Selima Sfar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daja Bedanova | Selima Sfar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |