H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Tina Pisnik H2H: 2-0

Daja Bedanova holds a 2–0 lead over Tina Pisnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daja Bedanova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2002 Gold Coast quarterfinal 6-1 3-0 RET.

CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #28 6-1 3-0 (ret.) Tina Pisnik #63 Match data Jan 4, 2002* QF Gold Coast Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Daja Bedanova #189 4-6 7-5 6-3 Tina Pisnik #74 Match data Mar 14, 2000* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tina Pisnik #592 #29 1,046 1,720 91 119 43.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Tina Pisnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #414 1,493 0 0
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 1999 11–9 55.0% #81 1,595 0 0
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 2000 10–16 38.5% #73 1,586 0 1
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 2001 16–17 48.5% #63 1,625 0 1
21 2002 23–24 48.9% #47 1,688 0 1
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 2003 23–27 46.0% #31 1,718 0 1
23 2004 8–23 25.8% #131 1,536 0 1
24 2005 0–2 0.0% #495 1,501 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Tina Pisnik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2000 2 7 9 22.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2002 14 15 29 48.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2004 3 13 16 18.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2005 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% 40 63 103 38.8% 29 36 65 44.6% 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Tina Pisnik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 50.0% -0.50 -0.06
17 2000 1698 131.5 +23 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15 1998 1493 94.0 0.0% -4.50 -0.07
18 2001 1772 151.8 +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 1999 1596 124.1 -4 +11 52.2% +0.17 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.1 +0.01
19 2002 1718 137.2 -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 2000 1586 123.4 -30 +38 +7 44.4% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 4–6 (40%) 93.0 -0.32
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 -0.74 2001 1626 120.7 -13 -18 +17 50.6% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 9–6 (60%) 99.3 +0.35
21 2002 1689 130.6 -18 -42 -52 48.0% -0.32 8–4 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.7 -2.20
22 2005 1600 108.4 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 -0.49 2003 1719 131.1 +1.33 +1.11 1.083 51.5% -38 -38 -46 47.5% -0.01 10–10 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 -0.09
23 2004 1536 108.7 -2.55 -0.52 0.706 40.8% -6 +61 +85 37.1% -0.90 2–10 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 91.2 +0.80
24 2005 1502 94.2 0.0% -3.50 +0.16
Career 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 1721 127.5 +0.36 +0.70 0.962 48.8% -19 -5 -3 46.1% -0.32 33–40 (45%) 21–24 (47%) 96.1 -0.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.