H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dally Randriantefy vs Angeles Montolio H2H: 0-1
Angeles Montolio holds a 1–0 lead over Dally Randriantefy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angeles Montolio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Angeles Montolio won the 2001 Acapulco fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAD
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2001* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Angeles Montolio | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Dally Randriantefy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dally Randriantefy | #99 | #44 | 721 | 1,690 | 43 | 66 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Angeles Montolio | #601 | #22 | 1,109 | 1,818 | 86 | 94 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dally Randriantefy | Angeles Montolio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #114 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #172 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #260 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #164 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #60 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #55 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #23 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #102 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #134 | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |