H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dally Randriantefy vs Florencia Labat H2H: 1-0
Dally Randriantefy holds a 1–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dally Randriantefy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dally Randriantefy won the 1995 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAD
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dally Randriantefy | 6-3 7-6(5) | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dally Randriantefy | #99 | #44 | 721 | 1,690 | 43 | 66 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dally Randriantefy | Florencia Labat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #114 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #164 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #102 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |