H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Dally Randriantefy vs Ludmila Cervanova H2H: 0-1
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 1–0 lead over Dally Randriantefy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ludmila Cervanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2005 Acapulco semifinal 2-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAD
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2005* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Ludmila Cervanova | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | Dally Randriantefy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dally Randriantefy | #99 | #44 | 721 | 1,690 | 43 | 66 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dally Randriantefy | Ludmila Cervanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #114 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #164 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #102 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |