H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dally Randriantefy vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 0-1
Nicole Bradtke holds a 1–0 lead over Dally Randriantefy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1996 German Open second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAD
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1996* | German Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Nicole Bradtke | 6-3 6-3 | Dally Randriantefy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dally Randriantefy | #99 | #44 | 721 | 1,690 | 43 | 66 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Bradtke | #394 | #24 | 256 | 1,868 | 181 | 162 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dally Randriantefy | Nicole Bradtke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #123 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #78 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #114 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #61 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #45 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #164 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #102 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #394 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |