H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Dally Randriantefy vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 0-1
Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 1–0 lead over Dally Randriantefy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAD
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Clay | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-2 6-1 | Dally Randriantefy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dally Randriantefy | #99 | #44 | 721 | 1,683 | 43 | 69 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,906 | 142 | 165 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dally Randriantefy | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #772 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #164 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #102 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #62 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |