H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–2 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2014 Birmingham fourth round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 13, 2014* Birmingham WTA 500 R16 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-0 Daniela Hantuchova #31 Match data
May 4, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #35 6-3 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Feb 11, 2011* Pattaya WTA 250 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #32 7-6(3) 6-3 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Sep 30, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 2-6 6-0 4-0 (ret.) Daniela Hantuchova #29 Match data
Sep 26, 2009* Seoul WTA 250 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8