H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Daniela Marzano vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 0-1

Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Daniela Marzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1974 Monte Carlo quarterfinal 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Marzano
ITA
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Pericoli
ITA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 6-4 7-6 Daniela Marzano Match data Apr 13, 1974* QF Monte Carlo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniela Marzano — — — 1,599 37 70 34.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lea Pericoli — — — 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Marzano Lea Pericoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1968 0–5 0.0% — 1,428 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1969 0–5 0.0% — 1,375 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1970 7–8 46.7% — 1,441 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1971 7–11 38.9% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1973 0–2 0.0% — 1,432 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1974 0–3 0.0% — 1,415 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1975 1–4 20.0% — 1,416 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1976 5–7 41.7% — 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1977 3–4 42.9% — 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1979 3–9 25.0% — 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1980 4–3 57.1% — 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1968 8–5 61.5% — 1,586 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1969 15–7 68.2% — 1,705 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 1970 11–7 61.1% — 1,756 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1971 9–8 52.9% — 1,752 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,659 0 3
38 — — — — — — — 1973 4–3 57.1% — 1,648 0 3
39 — — — — — — — 1974 6–6 50.0% — 1,641 0 3
40 — — — — — — — 1975 2–7 22.2% — 1,554 0 3
41 — — — — — — — 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniela Marzano Lea Pericoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1968 1429 90.9 — — — — — -32 — 9.1% -2.73 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1969 1376 89.2 — — — — — -48 — 23.1% -2.46 0–3 (0%) — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1970 1441 101.3 — — — — — -13 — 42.9% -0.66 4–3 (57%) — — +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1971 1483 108.8 — — — — — -17 +43 41.0% -0.85 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1972 1456 92.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1973 1433 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1974 1415 104.5 — — — — — -48 — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1975 1416 108.0 — — — — — -43 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1976 1462 108.4 — — — — — -41 +101 46.4% -0.61 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1977 1474 103.7 — — — — — -52 +69 47.1% -0.18 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1978 1556 110.3 — — — — — -134 +42 48.3% -0.66 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 1540 114.4 — — — — +24 -142 — 30.0% -1.43 3–3 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1980 1553 105.3 — — — — — -121 — 60.0% +0.67 0–1 — — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1586 120.0 — — — — +5 +12 — 70.8% +1.92 1–1 — — +0.13
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1705 134.1 — — — — — +26 — 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) — — -1.00
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1757 135.6 — — — — — -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) — — -0.73
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1752 125.6 — — — — — +1 — 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) — — -0.10
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1659 111.6 — — — — — +28 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.57
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1648 114.4 — — — — — +17 — 80.0% +2.50 — — — +1.43
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1642 116.2 — — — — — +20 — 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1555 100.4 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +1.40
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1548 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12
Career — 1599 107.5 — — — — +24 -47 +59 38.7% -0.97 11–24 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 97.2 +5.77 — 1773 132.2 — — — — +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.