H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Daniela Marzano vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 0-1
Tory Ann Fretz holds a 1–0 lead over Daniela Marzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tory Ann Fretz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tory Ann Fretz won the 1971 Venice third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 1971* | Venice | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-2 6-1 | Daniela Marzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Marzano | — | — | — | 1,599 | 37 | 70 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniela Marzano | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,374 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1980 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |