H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Dawn Buth vs Ansley Cargill H2H: 1-0

Dawn Buth holds a 1–0 lead over Ansley Cargill in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dawn Buth leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dawn Buth won the 2000 US Open first round 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dawn Buth
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Ansley Cargill
USA Age 44 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dawn Buth #143 7-6 7-5 Ansley Cargill #259 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dawn Buth #687 #96 354 1,516 2 8 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ansley Cargill #389 #90 400 1,564 6 18 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dawn Buth Ansley Cargill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #268 1,484 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #232 1,476 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 2–4 33.3% #122 1,484 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 4–9 30.8% #110 1,475 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #241 1,463 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #301 1,453 0 0
24 2000 1–1 50.0% #121 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2001 1–7 12.5% #186 1,449 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dawn Buth Ansley Cargill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1484 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1477 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 113.6 — — — — +22 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 -0.18
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1475 100.9 -3.24 -2.26 0.507 35.7% +2 +72 — 27.6% -1.93 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.51
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1463 107.6 +1.85 -2.17 0.535 42.3% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.12
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1454 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
24 2000 1499 98.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1449 100.5 — — — — +80 +44 — 22.2% -2.17 0–2 — — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1516 99.7 — — — — +80 +44 — 27.3% -1.91 0–2 1–0 — +2.20 — 1564 108.0 -1.97 -2.24 0.512 37.4% +13 +72 — 27.3% -1.67 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.