H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Anke Huber H2H: 1-3
Anke Huber holds a 3–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anke Huber leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2001 Estoril third round 7-5 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2001* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Denisa Chladkova | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | Anke Huber | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anke Huber | 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2001* | Nice | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Anke Huber | 6-4 6-2 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| May 3, 2000* | Hamburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Anke Huber | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Anke Huber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 |