H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Anna Kournikova H2H: 0-1
Anna Kournikova holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Kournikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Kournikova won the 2000 Indian Wells second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2000* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anna Kournikova | 7-5 6-2 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Kournikova | #606 | #8 | 2,158 | 2,072 | 184 | 120 | 60.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Anna Kournikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #65 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,971 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #35 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |