H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-1

Denisa Chladkova holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2002 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Anne Kremer #33 6-3 6-4 Denisa Chladkova #47 Match data
May 31, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Denisa Chladkova #49 4-6 6-2 6-3 Anne Kremer #31 Match data
Feb 19, 2000* Hanover WTA 500 QF Hard Denisa Chladkova #56 6-2 6-3 Anne Kremer #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2