H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 1-1

Denisa Chladkova and Barbara Rittner are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on clay, while Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2004 Palermo round of 32 4-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denisa Chladkova #63 4-6 7-5 6-4 Barbara Rittner #163 Match data Jul 22, 2004* R32 Palermo Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Barbara Rittner #47 6-4 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #70 Match data Jun 23, 1999* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,729 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,896 211 218 49.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,575 0 0 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,439 0 0 1992 25–16 61.0% #29 1,850 0 1
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,636 0 0 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,843 0 1
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,643 0 0 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,819 0 1
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,651 0 0 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,729 0 1
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,638 0 0 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,727 0 1
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,665 0 0 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,652 0 1
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,697 0 0 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,663 0 1
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,654 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,631 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,567 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,570 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denisa Chladkova Barbara Rittner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
19 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 13 7 20 65.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2000 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1994 11 8 19 57.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
23 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 6 10 16 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 60 107 43.9% 60 68 128 46.9% 12 16 28 42.9% 10 21 31 32.3% — 83 93 176 47.2% 73 74 147 49.7% 18 19 37 48.6% 37 32 69 53.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denisa Chladkova Barbara Rittner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1507 99.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 1578 111.0 — — — — +7 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.27 1990 1557 121.6 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 1–0 — -0.40
18 1997 1575 112.6 — — — — -43 -13 +99 41.2% -0.60 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 +1.28 1991 1709 130.4 — — — — +4 -111 — 52.9% +0.15 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 106.0 +1.01
19 1998 1439 95.8 — — — — +46 +12 +174 22.4% -1.92 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +1.23 1992 1850 151.2 — — — — -12 -152 -246 57.8% +0.43 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 103.8 -1.88
20 1999 1636 129.9 — — — — -59 -17 — 52.1% +0.23 4–3 (57%) 5–2 (71%) 105.2 -0.19 1993 1844 151.4 — — — — +11 -88 — 60.9% +0.72 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 -1.04
21 2000 1643 131.0 — — — — -12 -10 — 47.6% -0.17 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 99.2 +1.37 1994 1820 146.5 — — — — +35 -80 -177 58.9% +0.85 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -1.12
22 2001 1651 135.1 — — — — -37 +64 — 46.3% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 95.3 -2.05 1995 1729 138.0 — — — — +52 -26 — 53.9% +0.47 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 96.7 -0.26
23 2002 1638 123.6 — — — — -60 +75 — 45.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 -1.33 1996 1728 144.8 — — — — +59 -24 — 46.7% -0.05 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -1.28
24 2003 1665 133.0 -0.58 +0.63 0.946 49.5% 0 +6 — 50.6% +0.14 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 +0.29 1997 1653 135.9 — — — — +28 +52 -38 42.9% -0.07 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -1.13
25 2004 1697 124.8 +0.92 -0.86 1.000 50.1% -47 +20 -148 48.9% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 -0.58 1998 1664 132.7 — — — — -29 +97 — 48.4% +0.21 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.20
26 2005 1553 111.2 -1.78 -1.80 0.740 43.5% +28 +36 +9 28.6% -1.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.90 1999 1655 126.4 — — — — +7 +43 -46 45.8% -0.24 5–5 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.69
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1661 124.8 — — — — +33 -20 -41 48.1% 0.00 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.8 -0.48
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1619 127.0 — — — — +17 +56 +14 50.6% +0.30 5–8 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 97.9 -0.24
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1632 131.4 — — — — 0 +51 -45 44.7% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -0.85
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1568 107.0 -0.66 -2.21 0.611 40.9% -12 +39 +86 35.4% -1.04 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.2 -0.85
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1571 109.3 -1.05 +2.64 0.990 49.4% — +36 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.31
Career — 1729 128.6 -0.37 -0.69 0.894 47.9% -20 +20 +31 44.3% -0.38 38–43 (47%) 28–37 (43%) 96.0 -0.37 — 1897 144.7 -0.82 -0.27 0.767 44.3% +16 -11 -47 50.7% +0.17 61–74 (45%) 39–39 (50%) 96.9 -2.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.