H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Barbara Schett H2H: 1-2
Barbara Schett holds a 2–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbara Schett leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2000 Leipzig fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2000* | Leipzig | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Schett | 6-3 6-2 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2000* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Schett | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1999* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Denisa Chladkova | 6-2 6-1 | Barbara Schett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Barbara Schett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |