H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Bianka Lamade H2H: 0-1

Bianka Lamade holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bianka Lamade leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bianka Lamade won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 128 6-1 6-7(1) 6-3.

CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bianka Lamade #63 6-1 6-7(1) 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #46 Match data Jun 27, 2001* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,729 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bianka Lamade #1,261 #59 538 1,668 21 28 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Bianka Lamade
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 2000 3–2 60.0% #126 1,542 0 0
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,575 0 0 2001 14–12 53.8% #67 1,627 0 1
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,439 0 0 2002 4–13 23.5% #223 1,537 0 1
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,636 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #178 1,527 0 1
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,643 0 0
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,651 0 0
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,638 0 0
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,665 0 0
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,697 0 0
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denisa Chladkova Bianka Lamade
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1996 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2001 7 3 10 70.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2003 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2000 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 47 60 107 43.9% 60 68 128 46.9% 12 16 28 42.9% 10 21 31 32.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denisa Chladkova Bianka Lamade
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1507 99.1 50.0% -1.50 +0.06
17 1996 1578 111.0 +7 54.5% +0.09 1–0 -0.27 2000 1542 112.0 +40 58.3% +0.17 1–1 +0.15
18 1997 1575 112.6 -43 -13 +99 41.2% -0.60 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 +1.28 2001 1628 123.2 -38 +12 49.1% -0.16 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 +0.29
19 1998 1439 95.8 +46 +12 +174 22.4% -1.92 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +1.23 2002 1537 104.6 +28 +5 +27 28.2% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–1 -0.54
20 1999 1636 129.9 -59 -17 52.1% +0.23 4–3 (57%) 5–2 (71%) 105.2 -0.19 2003 1527 98.8 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.14
21 2000 1643 131.0 -12 -10 47.6% -0.17 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 99.2 +1.37
22 2001 1651 135.1 -37 +64 46.3% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 95.3 -2.05
23 2002 1638 123.6 -60 +75 45.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 -1.33
24 2003 1665 133.0 -0.58 +0.63 0.946 49.5% 0 +6 50.6% +0.14 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 +0.29
25 2004 1697 124.8 +0.92 -0.86 1.000 50.1% -47 +20 -148 48.9% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 -0.58
26 2005 1553 111.2 -1.78 -1.80 0.740 43.5% +28 +36 +9 28.6% -1.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.90
Career 1729 128.6 -0.37 -0.69 0.894 47.9% -20 +20 +31 44.3% -0.38 38–43 (47%) 28–37 (43%) 96.0 -0.37 1669 116.2 -11 +16 +27 41.8% -0.67 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.