H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Els Callens H2H: 0-1
Els Callens holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Els Callens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2000 Australian Open second round 2-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Els Callens | 2-6 7-5 6-4 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |