H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Flora Perfetti H2H: 0-1

Flora Perfetti holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Flora Perfetti leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Flora Perfetti won the 1998 Wimbledon round of 128 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Flora Perfetti
ITA Age 57 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Flora Perfetti #111 6-0 6-1 Denisa Chladkova #62 Match data Jun 24, 1998* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,729 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Flora Perfetti #415 #54 419 1,600 31 59 34.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Flora Perfetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,439 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,651 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,638 0 0 1992 3–4 42.9% #108 1,515 0 0
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,665 0 0 1993 1–9 10.0% #315 1,435 0 0
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 1995 3–7 30.0% #120 1,458 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 10–9 52.6% #69 1,563 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1997 7–15 31.8% #102 1,555 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1998 6–12 33.3% #112 1,525 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1999 1–3 25.0% #225 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denisa Chladkova Flora Perfetti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — —
25 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 60 107 43.9% 60 68 128 46.9% 12 16 28 42.9% 10 21 31 32.3% — 7 13 20 35.0% 21 39 60 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denisa Chladkova Flora Perfetti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1507 99.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 1578 111.0 — — — — +7 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1575 112.6 — — — — -43 -13 +99 41.2% -0.60 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1439 95.8 — — — — +46 +12 +174 22.4% -1.92 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1636 129.9 — — — — -59 -17 — 52.1% +0.23 4–3 (57%) 5–2 (71%) 105.2 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 1643 131.0 — — — — -12 -10 — 47.6% -0.17 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 99.2 +1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1651 135.1 — — — — -37 +64 — 46.3% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 95.3 -2.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 1638 123.6 — — — — -60 +75 — 45.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 -1.33 1992 1516 104.7 — — — — — +55 — 47.1% -0.23 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.37
24 2003 1665 133.0 -0.58 +0.63 0.946 49.5% 0 +6 — 50.6% +0.14 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 +0.29 1993 1436 96.5 — — — — — +51 — 10.0% -3.30 — 2–0 — +0.34
25 2004 1697 124.8 +0.92 -0.86 1.000 50.1% -47 +20 -148 48.9% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 1553 111.2 -1.78 -1.80 0.740 43.5% +28 +36 +9 28.6% -1.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.90 1995 1459 119.3 — — — — — +79 — 36.4% -0.86 0–2 — — -0.34
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1564 117.4 — — — — — +56 — 51.1% +0.23 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.7 +0.60
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1556 120.2 — — — — 0 -28 — 38.5% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1525 112.3 — — — — +36 -42 — 37.5% -1.25 1–3 (25%) — — +0.80
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1491 94.9 — — — — +50 — — 30.0% -1.60 1–1 1–0 — +0.65
Career — 1729 128.6 -0.37 -0.69 0.894 47.9% -20 +20 +31 44.3% -0.38 38–43 (47%) 28–37 (43%) 96.0 -0.37 — 1601 116.6 — — — — +18 +24 — 38.5% -0.88 10–18 (36%) 9–5 (64%) 100.7 +3.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.