H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Laura Granville H2H: 1-1
Denisa Chladkova and Laura Granville are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Granville won the 2004 Cincinnati fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2004* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Laura Granville | 6-1 6-1 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Denisa Chladkova | 6-3 6-0 | Laura Granville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Laura Granville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |