H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 1-0

Denisa Chladkova holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 1999 Luxembourg round of 32 7-5 7-5.

CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denisa Chladkova #66 7-5 7-5 Laurence Courtois #76 Match data Sep 23, 1999* R32 Luxembourg Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,729 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laurence Courtois #484 #37 565 1,701 75 94 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Laurence Courtois
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 1993 3–3 50.0% #104 1,520 0 0
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,575 0 0 1994 8–13 38.1% #105 1,545 0 0
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,439 0 0 1995 14–14 50.0% #64 1,624 0 0
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,636 0 0 1996 20–16 55.6% #44 1,697 0 0
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,643 0 0 1997 4–9 30.8% #183 1,647 0 0
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,651 0 0 1998 4–9 30.8% #125 1,578 0 0
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,638 0 0 1999 13–17 43.3% #78 1,546 0 0
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,665 0 0 2000 6–10 37.5% #130 1,538 0 0
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,697 0 0 2001 3–3 50.0% #166 1,540 0 0
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denisa Chladkova Laurence Courtois
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1996 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 9 7 16 56.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2000 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 47 60 107 43.9% 60 68 128 46.9% 12 16 28 42.9% 10 21 31 32.3% 22 31 53 41.5% 32 37 69 46.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denisa Chladkova Laurence Courtois
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1507 99.1 50.0% -1.50 +0.06
17 1996 1578 111.0 +7 54.5% +0.09 1–0 -0.27 1993 1521 107.7 +38 +20 53.3% +0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.37
18 1997 1575 112.6 -43 -13 +99 41.2% -0.60 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 +1.28 1994 1545 117.7 +33 +35 40.0% -1.20 4–4 (50%) 3–0 (100%) +0.11
19 1998 1439 95.8 +46 +12 +174 22.4% -1.92 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +1.23 1995 1625 121.6 -31 -14 -24 50.0% -0.24 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.7 +0.28
20 1999 1636 129.9 -59 -17 52.1% +0.23 4–3 (57%) 5–2 (71%) 105.2 -0.19 1996 1698 120.0 -38 -71 -19 50.0% -0.11 11–5 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 109.5 +1.19
21 2000 1643 131.0 -12 -10 47.6% -0.17 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 99.2 +1.37 1997 1648 109.2 +21 -63 37.0% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.6 +0.08
22 2001 1651 135.1 -37 +64 46.3% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 95.3 -2.05 1998 1579 117.9 +32 -27 41.9% -0.13 0–5 (0%) 0–1 +0.02
23 2002 1638 123.6 -60 +75 45.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 -1.33 1999 1546 109.3 +1 +26 +89 45.2% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.88
24 2003 1665 133.0 -0.58 +0.63 0.946 49.5% 0 +6 50.6% +0.14 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 +0.29 2000 1539 113.0 +52 40.0% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 -0.15
25 2004 1697 124.8 +0.92 -0.86 1.000 50.1% -47 +20 -148 48.9% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 -0.58 2001 1540 100.3 +39 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 +0.63
26 2005 1553 111.2 -1.78 -1.80 0.740 43.5% +28 +36 +9 28.6% -1.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.90
Career 1729 128.6 -0.37 -0.69 0.894 47.9% -20 +20 +31 44.3% -0.38 38–43 (47%) 28–37 (43%) 96.0 -0.37 1701 119.8 -4 +2 +6 45.3% -0.37 33–34 (49%) 26–23 (53%) 102.4 +2.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.