H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Martina Sucha H2H: 1-1
Denisa Chladkova and Martina Sucha are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on grass, while Martina Sucha leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2004 S Hertogenbosch third round 4-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Denisa Chladkova | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Martina Sucha | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2001* | Bratislava | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Martina Sucha | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martina Sucha | #948 | #37 | 859 | 1,730 | 96 | 125 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Martina Sucha | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #65 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #93 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #83 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |