H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 1-2

Miriam Oremans holds a 2–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on carpet, while Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2001 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denisa Chladkova #49 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #78 Match data May 30, 2001* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Miriam Oremans #73 6-4 6-0 Denisa Chladkova #45 Match data Oct 28, 2000* SF Bratislava Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Miriam Oremans #52 7-6 6-7 6-0 Denisa Chladkova #45 Match data Sep 25, 1997* R32 Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,729 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,575 0 0 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,439 0 0 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,636 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,643 0 0 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,651 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,638 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,665 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,697 0 0 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denisa Chladkova Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2000 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
Career — 47 60 107 43.9% 60 68 128 46.9% 12 16 28 42.9% 10 21 31 32.3% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denisa Chladkova Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1507 99.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 1578 111.0 — — — — +7 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.27 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 1997 1575 112.6 — — — — -43 -13 +99 41.2% -0.60 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 +1.28 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 1998 1439 95.8 — — — — +46 +12 +174 22.4% -1.92 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +1.23 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 1999 1636 129.9 — — — — -59 -17 — 52.1% +0.23 4–3 (57%) 5–2 (71%) 105.2 -0.19 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 2000 1643 131.0 — — — — -12 -10 — 47.6% -0.17 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 99.2 +1.37 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 2001 1651 135.1 — — — — -37 +64 — 46.3% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 95.3 -2.05 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 2002 1638 123.6 — — — — -60 +75 — 45.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 -1.33 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 2003 1665 133.0 -0.58 +0.63 0.946 49.5% 0 +6 — 50.6% +0.14 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 +0.29 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 2004 1697 124.8 +0.92 -0.86 1.000 50.1% -47 +20 -148 48.9% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 -0.58 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 2005 1553 111.2 -1.78 -1.80 0.740 43.5% +28 +36 +9 28.6% -1.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.90 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
Career — 1729 128.6 -0.37 -0.69 0.894 47.9% -20 +20 +31 44.3% -0.38 38–43 (47%) 28–37 (43%) 96.0 -0.37 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.