H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 0-1
Natasha Zvereva holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1999 Sopot third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1999* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-3 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |