H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Radka Bobkova H2H: 2-0
Denisa Chladkova holds a 2–0 lead over Radka Bobkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2000 Bratislava third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 53
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2000* | Bratislava | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Denisa Chladkova | 7-5 6-3 | Radka Bobkova | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1997* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Denisa Chladkova | 7-6 6-4 | Radka Bobkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Radka Bobkova | #639 | #47 | 322 | 1,658 | 47 | 73 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Radka Bobkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #53 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #85 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #130 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,525 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #88 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #639 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |