H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 1-3
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 3–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2000 Berlin third round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2000* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Denisa Chladkova | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1997* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-4 6-2 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1996* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-4 6-3 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1996* | Karlovy Vary | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 7-5 6-0 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |